What type of notification might be sent to inform that certain items revealed in an investigation do not warrant a disciplinary action but could lead to future complaints?

An advisory letter is used to communicate that while certain findings from an investigation do not warrant immediate disciplinary action, they may signal potential issues that could result in future complaints. This type of communication serves as a cautionary notice, advising the individuals involved about observed behaviors or circumstances that should be remedied or monitored moving forward to prevent escalation into more serious situations.

The intent of an advisory letter is to provide guidance and encourage corrective measures without the severity associated with formal disciplinary actions. It aims to promote awareness and prompt proactive steps to mitigate risks, aligning with best practices in workplace management and employee relations.

On the other hand, a warning letter typically conveys serious concerns that require immediate attention and often precedes formal disciplinary measures. Informed consent does not apply in this context, as it relates to permissions and agreements rather than addressing findings from investigations. An investigation summary would generally provide a detailed account of the findings and conclusions of the investigation itself, rather than serving as a notification about ongoing concerns.